| Article
on “Renewing Our Global Values: A Multilateralism
for Peace, Prosperity, and Freedom”, published
in the Harvard Human Rights Journal, (Spring 2006)
|
General:
“To remain the symbol of the world’s ethical commitment
to peace, prosperity and freedom, the U.N. must recommit itself
to serving all of its many stakeholders, providing them with
the effective and ethically legitimate voice they deserve.
Only then can the Charter’s mission to “practice
tolerance” and spread its faith in “the dignity
and worth of the human person” be realized.”
“The U.N. must be an organization that learns from
its institutional heritage and continuously adapts its practices
to better address current challenges facing the international
community. There is no question that we can do more to foster
a culture of political responsibility in all U.N. organs.”
“The U.N. must be a site for learning from diverse
approaches, for sharing best practices. Our diverse humanitarian
organizations should be encouraged to innovate and to develop
new tools to respond to old problems. Where the U.N. can contribute,
it should be prepared to pick up an oar alongside and in partnership
with other organizations, be they public or private, regional
or global. The U.N. will need to ensure that its own efforts
are well coordinated – but that should also not mean
that they are uniform. We can and should coordinate the heterogeneous,
but we cannot and should not homogenize what we have coordinated.”
UN Reform:
“But the real need for significant institutional reform
does not in the least detract from the significance of the
Charter’s ethical vision. We must not allow our criticism
of the U.N.’s performance to derail the opportunity
to renew that moral vision and rearticulate those fundamental
human values for this century.”
“We must remember that when the U.N. is ineffective,
it is ineffective for everyone. When the U.N. fails, it fails
us all. The status quo benefits no one – and that should
be sufficient for the international community to pursue more
vigorously efforts to strengthen what are the pillars of this
great Organization.”
“As the U.N.’s missions become more expansive,
its capacity to coordinate both internally and with private
actors must also be enhanced. Reform must be pursued with
a view to ensure that the U.N. uses the most effective strategy.
And it is particularly important that the U.N. strategize
to develop better channels of coordination.”
Human Rights:
“The language of human rights can be misused and can
limit our vision of what humanity might achieve. It is no
surprise that great injustice, even the senseless violence
of war, can sometimes be defended in the rhetoric of human
rights. We should not be surprised that a rising generation
sometimes seeks new language to articulate its aspirations
for freedom and social justice. As we have expanded the human
rights vernacular, we have sometimes settled for vague and
noble-sounding words rather than engaging in the difficult
social and political work necessary to build justice on the
ground where rights often conflict and hard choices must inevitably
be made.”
“As we think about a world of “larger freedom”,
however, the human rights tradition must remain our starting
point. When we hear affirmations of the right to fresh drinking
water alongside the right not to be tortured, a right to vote
or even a right to entrepreneurship, we are hearing the surface
echoes of a deeper human yearning for freedom and dignity.”
“We must be clear that no one is free where women are
denied their rights. It is easy to treat men’s interests
as universal or global, while leaving women’s rights
to the peculiarities of their local context. We must be clear
that women’s freedom is human freedom.”
“Human rights have rightly been seen as the beginning
--- the background conditions necessary for human flourishing.
The freedom to flourish requires food, health, the capacity
to support oneself and one’s family. It requires that
one be confident of social inclusion in one’s community.
It requires good governance, and the political freedom to
hold one’s leaders accountable. And it requires freedom
from what the Charter termed ‘the scourge of war.’
”
Culture of Peace:
“This is the time to learn to embrace the diversity
within every culture, alongside differences in faith and belief.
This is the time to let diversity enrich and strengthen the
world, and to understand that the values of peace, of social
equality and of the sanctity of life are common to all religions.
A culture of peace and a dialogue among all faiths can instil
values of tolerance, mutual respect and understanding of diversity
and differences. But we must firmly build understanding into
our collective consciousness to sustain these values.”
“We are all richer in a world of cultural heterogeneity.
Our ability to recognize this truth will pave the way toward
making our diverse cultures the vehicles for the realization
of human rights rather than shields that guard against the
fulfillment of human dignity.”
Peace and security:
“We must rekindle the aspiration for both collective
security and peaceful change. To manage peace, we must learn
to manage change. Peace will be an ongoing process of listening,
adjustment, and understanding. Change has become increasingly
difficult to manage as conflicts within nations have come
to outnumber conflicts between nations.”
“Moreover, the peace and security we seek will not
be for the elites alone --- the world’s poorest, neediest,
most powerless have the most to gain should we realize the
Charter’s eloquent promise of life “in larger
freedom.” Nor should the desire for peace be used as
a pretext for conflict or repressing dissent. Peace cannot
be imposed. The peace we seek must be a peace of laws.”
“I am confident that the U.N. can sow the seeds for
a stable peace: a peace that nourishes and is nourished by
diversity, a peace that is rooted in our communities, a peace
that can withstand change. The U.N. can be a focal point for
an ethically robust global governance regime that will help
build a lasting peace, a peace of laws, if we can find the
courage to redeem the promise of our shared commitments together.”
Poverty alleviation:
“Communities trapped in the nightmare of poverty can
stoke the embers of ethnic conflict and political extremism.
Disease, hunger and illiteracy block the first move towards
developing self–reliance and impede full participation
in self-government and the global economy. Poverty alleviation
requires that individuals have basic access to the global
economy in the form of jobs and capital. It requires assistance
for nations to pursue development that is tempered by –
but not dominated by – the logic of the global economy.
It requires the commitment to help cultivate self-help and
“prosper thy neighbor” regional policies to advance
development goals.”
“All poverty is local – to the family, the village,
the neighborhood, the city. Solutions must also be local.
But all local solutions, different as they must inevitably
be, are now also part of the global economy, and must be supported
at the national and international level.”
“At the same time, we must build the local conditions,
the local expertise and knowledge, the regional and neighborly
collaboration necessary to spread the benefits of growth and
to ensure the stability needed for our poorest citizens, regions
and neighbors to prosper.”
Democracy:
“Sound democratic governance at every level offers the
hope that the voices of citizens who provide the backbone
of the economy and the government be heard consistently.”
“But democracy is more than a name or a slogan. Democracy
is realized when every citizen has the right to be heard on
the decisions that affect his or her future and when government
at every level is accountable and transparent.”
“Nations, communities, and citizens disagree vigorously
on what democracy means. That is how it should be –
democracy is not a recipe or a straightjacket. We can affirm
the spirit and promise of democracy without worshiping its
current institutional forms – without abandoning the
aspiration to experiment and remake our public institutions.
Heterogeneous government is no threat to democracy –
indeed, with greater democracy we would hope to see the human
spirit generate ever new institutional forms for this enduring
hope.”
“I believe we must advance a richer, more substantive
version of democracy than most global citizens know today.
Our moral vision for democracy – and for the freedom
it must bring – cannot stop at elections. It must embrace
the opportunity for all citizens – for women, for minorities,
for the poor and the dispossessed – to participate equally
in the public life of their nation and the public life of
the broader world. It must include freedom of expression,
association and religion. And it must affirm the freedom that
comes with the social and economic means – education,
health, security – to participate meaningfully in public
life.”
Good Governance:
“As it models what good governance might be, the United
Nations must be careful not to imagine that one model is all
good governance can be. Every society must find its own way
to responsive and accountable national leadership. When the
international community does become involved, we must focus
on building local ownership and engagement. We should navigate
by the principle that all local stakeholders must feel they
own whatever solutions are devised to overcome national institutional
or infrastructure weakness.”
Management reform:
“The U.N. administrative system must be a model of effective
and accountable administration and proper management. U.N.
programs throughout the world must be models of corruption-free
governance, responsive to stakeholders and held firmly accountable
for their performance. Whether the issue is results-based
budgeting, ensuring a discrimination-free workplace, or implementing
modern management techniques, the U.N. should be an illustration
of best practices.”
“Political accountability must be about results, performance
and goals, guided by optimization and efficiency, not the
details of management. Administrative accountability must
mean the flexibility to mobilize the Secretariat’s resources
to address new challenges.”
“The U.N. must have adequate internal structures to
instill in its staff the courage to be creative, together
with the ethical rectitude that is an obvious precondition
for employment in an organization that should be a symbol
for our limitless potential. In doing so, it lays the foundation
for allowing senior staff the flexibility and authority to
manage projects effectively with a view towards achieving
the best possible results on the ground.”
Role of the Secretary-General:
“The Secretary-General must guard the legitimacy of
his office and, along with it the power of his bully pulpit,
just as he must ensure the trust of all with whom he consults
with discretion and a reputation for honest and straightforward
communication. Few diplomatic advances are made by surprise
or ambush. The trust necessary for peace must be built judiciously
and earned by a track record of responsible cooperation and
consultation. Where he must speak out to defend the Charter,
the Secretary-General must be confident he has pursued every
avenue of cooperation and consultation, and he must be persuaded
that his public statement may, in fact, be effective.”
----------------------------------------------------
|